Posted by admin on January 12th, 2012
This article is being written as Californians are receiving the usual warnings about the Santa Ana winds. These winds come in the late fall and early winter periods as hot dry air is forced out of the deserts and heads for the sea. This weather warning will bring 2011 to a close with a bang. With 1560 tornadoes confirmed and 575 people killed, this has been one of the worst years on record for death and destruction caused by the wind. This includes the Super Outbreak in April which affected the larger part of the southern states and the midwest.
In a way, we have all been conditioned to think of this damage as being mainly a property problem. We see all the pictures of the winds picking up buildings and leaving nothing but wreckage behind. When the twisters move through a town, entire neighborhoods are flattened. So we routinely reach for the homeowners insurance policy and start reading the small print to see whether we are covered. As an aside, the insurers have been getting more restrictive with their coverage as the number of wind-related events have been increasing. Premium rates have been rising fast when the homes involved are more prone to damage. This can be the obvious problems of mobile homes and trailers through to older properties where roof construction may not be as robust. You may benefit from asking a builder for quotes to reinforce your roof – discussing the plans with your insurer can bring the premium rates down so rebuilding can be a good investment.
Although buildings are static targets, not everyone can drive their vehicles out of harm’s way. There are three major source of danger for vehicles. The wind can literally blow a high-sided vehicle over. If you are overtaking a semi-trailer truck or a bus, you can suddenly find yourself caught in a trap as something falls on to or in front of your vehicle. Equally, once a tornado or windstorm picks up branches or debris, it has to come down somewhere. If you are driving when it hits, it can cause an accident. If you are parked, it can simply damage the vehicle in your garage or parked on the yard. Secondly, wind can move water. It can be rain, sleet or snow, or in a lake or the sea. This combination can produce flooding which can seriously damage modern vehicles with their electronic systems. Thirdly, windstorms like Santa Ana routinely cause wild fires. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by admin on January 2nd, 2012
In the good old days before there were organized police forces, it was left to a few individuals to enforce the law. When they proved inadequate, there were feuds and vigilante action by the victims. Obviously, this fighting disturbed everyone, so states slowly got into the law enforcement business, recruiting and training people to keep the peace and identify criminals. Today, we rely on state and federal policing agencies, supported by CSI and other forensic agencies. But there’s been a fundamental and unchanging truth from the early days. More people avoid detection and profit from their crimes than are caught. That’s why the courts are forced to use deterrent sentencing. What judges are saying to potential criminals is there will be long periods of imprisonment if they are caught. The irony is that, if people were sure they would be caught, lighter punishments would be sufficient. It would cost us less to keep all these people in jail. Our society would be safer.
So why is it so difficult to detect fraud? Surely dishonesty should be obvious to an experienced insurance company? Well, sadly, detecting which claims are fraudulent is not easy. Let’s take a simple question. Both drivers involved admit there was an accident. One driver submits a medical report showing neck injuries. On what basis should the insurer challenge the medical report? Well, detailed investigation might show this particular clinic advertises for people to report accidents to them. Or this clinic may consistently be receiving business through referral networks. Either way, the clinic is found to specialize in the treatment of traffic accident injuries. This could make them highly skillful and deserving professional respect, or it could suggest the clinic exaggerates the injuries for its own profit when it bills for treatment, paying commission to referral agents and passing only some of the benefit on to “patients” who get settlements for their injuries. Is an insurer supposed to get a second opinion from an independent doctor on every patient from suspect clinics? Or suppose someone wants to get out of an auto loan so stages a small accident and pays a repair shop to set off the air bags and certify more serious damage so the vehicle will be totaled. If this is a one-off event and there’s no pattern to suggest this repair shop is dishonest, why should this particular claim set off alarm bells? Read the rest of this entry »
